Davos Man Says ‘Whole Transparency’ For You

[ad_1]

That is Bare Capitalism fundraising week. 865 donors have already invested in our efforts to fight corruption and predatory conduct, notably within the monetary realm. Please be a part of us and take part through our donation web page, which exhibits the best way to give through examine, bank card, debit card or PayPal or our new cost processor, Clover. Examine why we’re doing this fundraiser, what we’ve achieved within the final 12 months,, and our present objective, rewarding our visitor bloggers.

Yves right here. Many many commentators, together with ones on this website, have been describing the rise of the surveillance state and the way the personal sector has each enabled it and does its personal spying for enjoyable and revenue. Reasonably than say the quiet half out loud, our soi-disant elites are as an alternative making an attempt to faux we’re all on board with new Orwellian reversals of conventional which means, right here of the phrase transparency.

By Thomas Neuburger. Initially printed at God’s Spies
Davos Man Says ‘Whole Transparency’ For You

“Lyse Doucet, Sheryl Sandberg, Melinda Gates, and Justin Trudeau at Davos 2016 addressing the session Progress in direction of Parity” (supply)

A short one for right this moment, however a shocker when you haven’t heard this already.

Klaus Schwab is the founding father of the World Financial Discussion board (WEF) and has been its chairman since 1971. The WEF famously (or notoriously) hosts the annual Davos convention, at which world political and thought leaders meet to debate, effectively, the way forward for the world.

Critics of the Davos discussion board, for instance, the Transnational Institute (TNI), say“the Discussion board is planning to exchange a recognised democratic mannequin with a mannequin the place a self-selected group of “stakeholders” make selections on behalf of the individuals. The assume tank summarises that we’re more and more getting into a world the place gatherings similar to Davos are ‘a silent world coup d’état’ to seize governance.” (see hyperlink for footnotes)

Should you’re a type of who imagine that Davos, certainly, is without doubt one of the conferences through which elites “make selections on behalf of the individuals,” you’ll love what the elites’ elite is saying now. Hear; the clip is brief.

That Phrase Doesn’t Imply What You Assume It Means

As many have identified, this definition of “transparency” turns the time period on its head. In Davos Man’s mouth, it means, “I get to see every part you’re doing; you get to see nothing I’m doing.” Concerning the latter, witness the “prosecution unto loss of life” being visited on Julian Assange for the crime of revealing American conflict crimes, amongst different secrets and techniques. Chris Hedges:

The present American Empire, broken and humiliated by troves of inside paperwork printed by WikiLeaks, will, for that reason, persecute Julian for the remainder of his life. It doesn’t matter who’s president or which political get together is in energy. Imperialists converse with one despotic voice.

Julian, for that reason, is present process a slow-motion execution.

Should you look across the nation, you’ll be able to see “transparency” rising as you watch. It’s been occurring since September 11, 2001, the day Osama bin Laden informed Bush to take our freedom, and Bush stated sure.

George W. Bush, who stole your freedom

And this system’s nonetheless rising:

Whole Info Consciousness was what the U.S. authorities’s large surveillance was known as:

Whole Info Consciousness (TIA) was a mass detection program by america Info Consciousness Workplace. … Admiral John Poindexter known as it a “Manhattan Mission for counter-terrorism”. In response to Senator Ron Wyden, TIA was the “largest surveillance program within the historical past of america”.

Later they acquired good and rebranded it, however nobody modified what it did.

Even Democrats Promote Mass Surveillance These Days

Democrats was against packages like this, a few of them anyway. Witness Ron Wyden’s assertion above.

As we speak, not a lot:

Home Democrats scrapped a vote to reauthorize nationwide safety surveillance authorities which have been expired since March after Republicans revolted from the measure following tweets from President Donald Trump urging them to oppose it.

Home Majority Chief Steny Hoyer stated Thursday morning that he was pulling the invoice to resume three authorities below the International Intelligence Surveillance Act from the ground on the request of Home Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a recognition the votes weren’t there to move it.

Does this concern you in any respect? It does me.

Does it make Democrats more durable for independents to love? I’d assume so.

And but they nonetheless do it. Ever ask your self why?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

[ad_2]

Leave a Comment